.

Capitol Review: Gay Marriage Amendment Moves to House

Amendment would define marriage as "union of one man and one woman."

The definition of marriage in Minnesota could come down to your vote.

Last week, Minnesota lawmakers moved the state closer to a ban on same-sex marriage.

With a 38-27 vote, the Senate approved a bill authored by State Sen. Dave Thompson (R-District 36) of Lakeville, that would amend the state's Constitution and redefine marriage as the “union of one man and one woman." If the House approves the bill, voters will decide in the 2012 general election who has the right to marry whom. The Republican-led House is expected to vote on the topic this week.

So far, debate on the issue has been heated.

State Sen. Scott Dibble (DFL-District 60) Minneapolis, who is openly gay, spoke passionately about the proposed amendment after the Senate vote.

“I can tell you that this is not the future that Minnesota wants for itself. This is not the future of the Republican Party, and they have made a grave, grave mistake. And I think they’re going to discover that very soon,” he said

“It’s a very shameful day for Minnesota,” Dibble continued.

Thompson, Lakeville's freshman Senator who is also Assistant Majority Leader, argued that conventional couples provide more nurturing environments for children than do same-sex spouses. He also asserted that marriage between a man and a woman was simply more natural.

“As a matter of fact and history, and I guess nature, it has always been that. Not to define marriage as the union of a man and a woman is inconsistent with the essence of the institution,” he told another Patch in an interview.

Thompson also argued for the legitimacy of a popular referendum on gay marriage.

“I think that how we define the most basic institution that we have in a society is a legitimate question to put to the people,” he said.

But Wendy Krauser, a Lakeville resident, said the bill is not only shameful, but is designed to manipulate people into voting to change the constitution.

"People aren't going to understand that a no vote is a vote to keep things status quo," she said. "I'm a lesbian and as it stands now, I can't marry my partner in Minnesota. All this bill threatens to do is make it nearly impossible to allow such marriages in the future."

Leaders nearby seem to support the bill, too. Northfield's State Senator Al DeKruif (R-District 25) Madison Lake, agreed that the definition of marriage should be determined through a statewide vote.

“We want the folks to decide,” he said.

Jaclyn Bovee, a junior that works at the school’s Gender and Sexuality Center, rejected DeKruif's line of reasoning.

“Marriage is civil right that everyone should be allowed to have access to, and I don’t think that civil rights should be up for a vote,” she said.

In the event of the amendment’s passage and ratification, for example, homosexual couples would be constitutionally ineligible for the tax benefits that come with state-sanctioned marriage.

“There are practical rights that come with marriage that everyone should have access to, regardless of who they’re in love with—there are social rights that come with marriage and there’s a social stigma that comes with not [being married]," Bovee said. "Everyone should have access to the social capital that comes with marriage regardless of who they love."

In response to the proposed change, the DFL has introduced the “Marriage and Family Protection Act,” which would define marriage as between "two persons" instead of "a man and a woman."

Surf's Up May 17, 2011 at 05:21 PM
With our schools suffering staggering budget cuts, I am horrified to think of the millions of dollars that will be poured into campaigns regarding this ballot item. What a waste of money!
Terry W Branham May 18, 2011 at 11:25 AM
Cudos to this bill. Why is it that in prior years there were at least 5 attempts by liberals to pass a same sex marriage amendment and the media did not tell us of that. This is not a civil rights issue as the same sex agenda could become a civil union. I believe same sex marriage would destroy the fabric of America. Why are our prisons filled by 73% of people who had no father figure. Do you think there may be a connection. Of course theere is. Why does the liberal media not tell us about that. Terry
Colin Lee May 18, 2011 at 03:12 PM
This bill accomplishes nothing. Zero. Zip. Nada. Marriage between two same sex partners is already illegal in Minnesota. The bill adds nothing except a lame excuse to use fearmongering to drive voters to the polls to re-elect a majority who wants to give away everything the American people entrusted to them. Free money to record profit oil drillers. Our Social Security to Wall Street. Our Medicare to health insurance swindlers. Trillions to the war profiteers. When does it end?! If passed, the Constitutional amendment adds no additional weight to Minnesota's prohibition. A single federal bill passed into law or a federal Supreme Court decision would overturn the amendment due to the Supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution. This bill is the DEFINITION of a do-nothing legislature. It has equally as much just as much weight and usefulness as banning shoplifting only for African Americans. Already illegal. Written to be overturned. Spiteful. Worthless.
stjevet May 19, 2011 at 05:14 AM
First of all wouldn't two fathers be better than one then?? Unless you are trying to say that our prisons are filled with people with Lesbian moms, I don't really see the connection (By the way most Lesbian moms that I know make sure that their children do have a male figure present in their lives). As to the fabric of America, I always think of dictatorships as being the ones to make rules strictly on religious beliefs, so I would assume that this would be more anti-American.
ABSG May 24, 2011 at 12:50 PM
Finally, let the citizens speak! I wish we would/could have a laundry list of issues that we can decide on vs. having a select few self serving representatives decide our needs, wants and freedoms! I have no problem letting the Majority Rule! Opression? Where in this bill does it state people can not continue to love one another? The issue is about what will constitutionally be recognized in the State of Minnesota as a legal marriage? Every human has their own opinion/belief/feelings/thoughts etc.....SO JUST VOTE - it's your chance to speak - one way or the other this will come to a consclusion.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »